
Article 1 
The Annex to Decision 2005/381/EC is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2 
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 March 2014.
For the Commission
Connie HEDEGAARD
Member of the Commission
ANNEX


ANNEX  1. 
Name and department of organisation:

Name of contact person:

Job title of contact person:

Address:

International telephone number:

E-mail:
 2. 
Questions in this section are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 2.1. 

Name Abbreviation Contact details
  


In the table below, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the national accreditation body appointed pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


Name Abbreviation Contact details (1)
  

Have you set up a national certification authority to certify verifiers pursuant to Article 54(2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012? Yes/No

If yes, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the national certification authority using the table below.


Name Abbreviation Contact details (1)
  

In the table below, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the registry administrator in your Member State.


Name Abbreviation Contact details (1)
  
 2.2. 
Please note that if a box in the table below is grey, the task is not relevant for either installations or aviation.


Competent authority in charge of: Installations Aviation
Issuance of permits  
Free allocation to stationary installations pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC  
Free allocation pursuant to Articles 3e and 3f of Directive 2003/87/EC  
Activities related to auctioning (the auctioneer mentioned in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010) (OJ L 302, 18.11.2010, p. 1)  
Financial measures with respect to indirect carbon leakage  
Issuance of allowances  
Approval of the monitoring plan and significant changes to the monitoring plan  
Receiving and assessing verified emissions reports and verification reports  
Making a conservative estimation of emissions according to Article 70 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 (OJ L 181, 12.7.2012, p. 30)  
Approval of improvement reports according to Article 69 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012  
Approval of the operator’s application to waive a verifier’s site visit pursuant to Article 31(1) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012  
Inspection and enforcement  
Information to the public  
Administration of unilateral inclusion of activities and gases under Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/EC  
Administration of installations excluded under Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC  
Other, please specify:  


 2.3. 

Name of the competent authority that is the focal point referred to in Article 69(2) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 Abbreviation
 

If more than one competent authority is designated in your Member State to carry out the activities in Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, what measures have been taken to coordinate the work of those competent authorities in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows if necessary.


Coordination of activities with respect to Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 Yes/No Comments (optional)
Does national legislation require a central competent authority to review and provide binding instructions on monitoring plans, notifications of changes to the monitoring plan or emissions reports?  
Does a central competent authority steer local and/or regional competent authorities by giving binding instructions and guidance?  
Does a central competent authority review and provide advice on monitoring plans, notifications and emissions reports on a voluntary basis?  
Are regular working groups or meetings organised with the competent authorities?  
Is common training organised for all competent authorities to ensure consistent implementation of requirements?  
Are IT systems or tools used to ensure common approaches to monitoring and reporting issues?  
Is a coordination group established, with competent authority staff, which discusses monitoring and reporting issues and develops common approaches?  
Are there other coordination activities? If yes, please specify:
 2.4. 

Coordination of activities with respect to Article 69(1) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 Yes/No Comments (optional)
Are regular meetings organised between the national accreditation body/national certification authority (if relevant) and the competent authority responsible for the coordination?  
Has a working group been established where the national accreditation body/national certification authority (if relevant), the competent authority and verifiers discuss accreditation and verification issues?  
Can the competent authority accompany the national accreditation body in accreditation activities as an observer?  
Are there other coordination activities? If yes, please specify:
 3. 
The second sub-question of question 3.1 and the second and third sub-questions of question 3.2 in this section are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 3.A.  3.1. 

Installations Number
Installations with low emissions 
Category A installations 
Category B installations 
Category C installations 
Total number of installations 

For which Annex I activities has your Member State issued permits under Directive 2003/87/EC? Please answer using the table below.


Annex I activity Yes/No
Combustion activities as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Refining of mineral oil 
Production of coke 
Metal ore (including sulphide ore) roasting or sintering, including pelletisation 
Production of pig iron or steel as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production or processing of ferrous metals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of primary aluminium 
Production of secondary aluminium as specific in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production or processing of non-ferrous metals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of cement clinker in rotary kilns as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of lime or calcination of dolomite or magnesite as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Manufacture of glass as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Manufacture of ceramic products as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Manufacture of mineral wool insulation material using glass, rock or slag as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Drying or calcination of gypsum or production of plaster boards and other gypsum products, as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of pulp as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of paper or cardboard as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of carbon black as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of nitric acid 
Production of adipic acid 
Production of glyoxal and glyoxylic acid 
Production of ammonia 
Production of bulk organic chemicals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of hydrogen (H2) and synthesis gas as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Production of soda ash (Na2CO3) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Capture of greenhouse gases from installations as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 
Transport of greenhouse gases by pipelines for geological storage in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114) 
Geological storage of greenhouse gases in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC 
 3.2. 
If yes, please complete the table and the questions below.


Main Annex I activity Total emissions of installations excluded under Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC Number of installations that have exceeded the threshold of 25 000 tonnes of CO2(e) and need to re-enter the emissions trading scheme
  

What verification measures have been implemented pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please specify below.

Have any simplified monitoring, reporting and verification requirements been established for installations whose annual verified emissions between 2008 and 2010 are below 5 000 tonnes of CO2(e) a year? Yes/No

If yes, please indicate below what simplified requirements apply.
 3.B.  3.3. 

Type of aircraft operators Number
Commercial aircraft operators 
Non-commercial aircraft operators 
Total number of aircraft operators 
Small emitters 

Are you aware of any additional aircraft operators for which you are responsible as administering Member State that should have submitted a monitoring plan and complied with other requirements under Directive 2003/87/EC? Yes/No

If yes, please specify the number of aircraft operators in the table below.


Total number of additional aircraft operators that should have complied with the EU ETS requirements 

If you would like to raise issues related to the number of these additional aircraft operators, please specify below.
 4. 
Question 4.1 and the first part of question 4.2 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 4.1. 
If yes, please specify in the table below how the integration was carried out. Add further rows if necessary.


Integration of the greenhouse gas emission permit (ETS permit) and the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) permit Yes/No Comments (optional)
Is the ETS permit part of the IED permit?  
Are the permitting procedures under the IED Directive and ETS permit integrated?  
Are the approval of monitoring plans and assessment of emissions reports carried out by IED regulators?  
Is inspection of the EU ETS activities carried out by the IED regulators?  
Is the integration carried out in another way? If yes, please specify:

If no, please specify in the table below how the coordination of conditions and procedures for the issue of the ETS permit and the IED permit are carried out. Add further rows if necessary.


Coordination of conditions and procedures for the issue of the ETS permit and the IED permit Yes/No Comments (optional)
IED regulators check whether an ETS permit is applicable and necessary, and inform the competent authority responsible for the activities under the EU ETS  
The legislation which transposes the IED Directive does not include emission or concentration limits for CO2  
IED regulators give binding instructions to the competent authority responsible for emissions trading during the permitting procedure  
IED regulators give advice on a voluntary and non-binding basis to the competent authority responsible for emissions trading during the permitting procedure  
Is the coordination carried out in another way? If yes, please specify:
 4.2. 

Category of changes Details of provisions in national law
When can permits be withdrawn by the competent authority? 
Does a permit expire under national law? If yes, under what circumstances? 
When is a permit changed as a result of an increase in capacity? 
When is a permit changed as a result of a decrease in capacity? 
When is a permit changed as a result of changes to the monitoring plan? 
Are there other types of permit updates? If yes, please provide details: 

What is the total number of permit updates that occurred in the reporting period? Please specify in the table below the number of permit updates as far as this is known to the competent authority.


Total number of permits updated in the reporting period 
 5.  5.A. 
Question 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 5.1. 
If yes, please specify below for which areas additional national legislation has been implemented.

Has additional national guidance been developed to support the understanding of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012? Yes/No

If yes, please specify below for which areas additional national guidance has been developed.
 5.2. What measures have been taken to complement the reporting requirements of other existing reporting mechanisms such as greenhouse gas inventory reporting and EPRTR reporting? Please specify below.
 5.3. 
If yes, please complete the tables below.


 Member State specific template or file format What elements of the template or specific file format are Member State specific?
Monitoring plan for installations  
Emissions report for installations  
Verification report for installations  
Improvement report for installations  




 Member State specific template or file format What elements of the template or specific file format are Member State specific?
Monitoring plan for aircraft operators  
Emissions report for aircraft operators  
Verification report for aircraft operators  
Improvement report for aircraft operators  



What measures have you implemented to comply with the requirements in Article 74(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012? Please specify below.
 5.4. 
If yes, please specify below what provisions you have implemented to comply with the requirements in Article 75(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012.
 5.B. 
Questions 5.7, 5.9, the second sub-question of 5.17 and the questions 5.19 and 5.20 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 5.5. 

Fuel type description Total fuel consumption (TJ) Total annual emissions (t CO2)
Hard coal  
Lignite and sub-bituminous coal  
Peat  
Coke  
Natural gas  
Coke oven gas  
Blast furnace gas  
Refinery gas and other process derived gases  
Fuel oil  
Liquefied petroleum gas  
Petroleum coke  
Other fossil fuels  

 5.6. 

CRF Category 1(Energy) CRF Category 2(Process emissions) Total emissions(t CO2(e)) Total combustion emissions(t CO2(e)) Total process emissions(t CO2(e))
    
 5.7. 

— the number of installations for which the competent authority has approved literature values referred to in Article 31(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012;
— the value, fuel type and calculation factor concerned as well as the source and justification for these literature values;
— the number of installations for which the competent authority has approved Type I default values, i.e. values referred to in Article 31(1)(d) and (e) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012;
— the value, fuel type or material type and calculation factor concerned as well as the source and justification for these Type I default values.


Type of value Fuel or material type Calculation factor Value used in practice Source of the value and its justification Number of installations for which the competent authority has approved the value



How many of the Type I default values are values listed in Annex VI to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 as referred to in Article 31(1)(a) of that Regulation?


Total number of Type I default values that are values as referred to in Article 31(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 
 5.8. 
If no, please indicate below the cases and reasons for not drawing up a sampling plan.

Are you aware of any particular problems or issues concerning sampling plans set-up by operators? Yes/No

If yes, please specify below problems or issues that have arisen.
 5.9. 

Name of fuel or material Number of installations for which the competent authority has allowed a different frequency Number of major source streams for which a different frequency is applied Confirmation that the sampling plan is fully documented and adhered toYes/No. If no, please specify the reason
   
 5.10. 

Installation identification code Affected source stream in the calculation based methodology Affected emission source in the measurement based methodology Affected monitoring parameter Highest tier required under Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 Tier applied in practice
     


 5.11. 

Monitoring methodology Main Annex I activity Number of installations affected
  

 5.12. 
If yes, please complete the table below.


Installation identification code Reason for applying the fall-back approach Parameter, for which not at least tier 1 was reached Estimated emissions affected by this parameter
   



 5.13. 

Installation category Main Annex I activity Type of improvement report Number of installations required to submit an improvement report Number of installations that submitted an improvement report in practice
    

 5.14. 
If yes, please complete the table below.


Installation identification code of the installation transferring the inherent CO2 or CO2 under Article 49 Type of transfer Installation identification code Amount of CO2 transferred(t CO2) Emissions of inherent CO2 received(t CO2) Type of receiving installation in the case of transfer of CO2 (Article 49) Permit number for the storage site (permit under Directive 2009/31/EC)
      





 5.15. Are there innovative technologies foreseen, other than those allowed under Article 49 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, that could be applied for permanent storage and for which you would like to bring to the attention of the Commission because of its relevance for future amendments to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012?
 5.16. 
If yes, please indicate in the table below, the total emissions of each installation, the emissions covered by continuous emission measurement, and whether the measured gas contains biomass CO2.


Installation identification code of installations emitting CO2 Installation identification code of installations emitting N2O Total annual emissions(t CO2(e)) Emissions covered by continuous measurement(t CO2(e)) Does the measured flue gas contain biomass?Yes/No
    


 5.17. 

— the number of category A, B and C installations using biomass;
— the total emissions from biomass which are considered zero rated, i.e. where no sustainability criteria apply or where the sustainability criteria are complied with;
— the total emissions from biomass which are not considered zero rated, i.e. where sustainability criteria apply but the sustainability criteria are not complied with;
— the energy content of the biomass which is considered zero rated; and
— the energy content of the biomass which is not considered zero rated.


Main Annex I activity Installation category Emissions from biomass to which sustainability criteria are applied and satisfied and emissions from biomass to which no sustainability criteria apply(t CO2(e)) Emissions from biomass to which the sustainability criteria apply but were not satisfied(t CO2(e)) Energy content of zero rated biomass(TJ) Energy content of non-zero rated biomass(TJ)
     

Which of the methods to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria are in general applied in your Member State? Please describe below the main elements if national systems are used to demonstrate this compliance.
 5.18. 

Waste type Emissions (t CO2)
 
 5.19. 
If yes, please specify in the table below what sort of risk assessment was carried out and on which principles it was configured.


Type of risk assessment General principles of the risk assessment
 

 5.20. 
If yes, please specify per item in the table below. Add further rows if necessary.


Innovative ways used to simplify compliance Yes/No
Customised guidance, templates and/or specific examples 
Workshops specifically designed for installations with low emissions 
Simplified template for monitoring plans 
Other, please specify:
 5.C. 
Questions 5.26 and 5.27 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 5.21. 

Method to determine the fuel consumption Number of aircraft operators Share (in %) of small emitters (of the total number of aircraft operators in the second column) determining fuel consumption
Method A  
Method B  
Method A and B  
 5.22. 

Total emissions of flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State (t CO2) Total emissions of domestic flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State (t CO2)
 
 5.23. 

— the number of aircraft operators using biofuels;
— the total emissions from biofuels which are considered zero rated, i.e. where the sustainability criteria are complied with;
— the total emissions from biofuels which are not considered zero rated, i.e. where sustainability criteria apply but the sustainability criteria are not complied with;
— the energy content of the biofuels which is considered zero rated; and
— the energy content of the biofuels which is not considered zero rated.


Number of aircraft operators using biofuels Emissions from biofuels to which sustainability criteria are applied and satisfied(t CO2) Emissions from biofuels to which the sustainability criteria apply but were not satisfied(t CO2) Energy content of zero rated biofuels(TJ) Energy content of non-zero rated biofuels(TJ)
    
 5.24. 

— the number of small emitters using the small emitters tool (SET) to determine the fuel consumption;
— the number of small emitters whose emission report is based on the SET and generated from the EU ETS support facility independently from any input of the aircraft operator;
— the number of aircraft operators using an alternative method to determine the emissions of missing flights; and
— the number of aircraft operators using the small emitters tool to determine the emissions of missing flights in accordance with Article 65(2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012.


Number of small emitters using the small emitters tool (SET) to determine the fuel consumption 
Number of small emitters whose emission report is based on the SET and generated from the EU ETS support facility independently from any input of the aircraft operator 
Number of aircraft operators using an alternative method to determine the emissions of missing flights 
Number of aircraft operators using the tool referred to in Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 to determine the emissions of missing flights 
 5.25. 

Number of aircraft operators required to submit an improvement report Number of aircraft operators that submitted an improvement report in practice
 
 5.26. 
If yes, please specify in the table below what type of risk assessment was carried out and on which principles it was configured.


Type of risk assessment General principles of risk assessment
 

 5.27. 
If yes, please specify per item in the table below. Add further rows if necessary.


Innovative ways used to simplify compliance Yes/No
Customised guidance and specific examples 
Workshops specifically designed for small emitters 
Simplified template for monitoring plans 
Other, please specify:
 6.  6.A.  6.1. 

Scope of accreditation or certification listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 Number of verifiers accredited in your Member State Number of verifiers certified in your Member State
  
 6.2. 

Information on the application of information exchange requirements specified in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012
Number of verifiers accredited by a national accreditation body in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member State For installations For aviation
 
Number of verifiers certified by a national certification authority in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member State (if relevant) For installations For aviation
 
Number of administrative measures imposed on verifiers accredited by your Member State Suspension Withdrawal of accreditation Reduction of scope
  
Number of administrative measures imposed on verifiers certified by your Member State (if relevant) Suspension Withdrawal of accreditation Reduction of scope
  
Number of times that the national accreditation body in your Member State has requested the national accreditation body in another Member State to carry out surveillance on its behalf in accordance with Article 49(5) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 
Number of complaints made about verifiers accredited by your Member State and the number that have been resolved Number of complaints made Number of complaints resolved
 
Number of complaints made about verifiers certified by your Member State and the number that have been resolved Number of complaints made Number of complaints resolved
 
Number of outstanding non-conformities for verifiers reported in the information exchange and the number that have been resolved Number of non-conformities Number of non-conformities resolved
 
 6.B.  6.3. 

Installation identification code Total annual emissions of the installation(t CO2(e)) Reason for making a conservative estimation Share (in %) of emissions of the installation conservatively estimated Method used to conservatively estimate the emissions Further action taken or proposed
     



 6.4. 
If yes, please provide information in the table below:


Main Annex I activity Type of issue found Number of installations Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general) Share (in %) of verified emissions reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority
    


 6.5. 
If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the table below:


Checks on the verified verification reports
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency. % 
Share of the emissions reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan % 
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with allocation data % 
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with other dataPlease provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the third column % 
Share of the emissions reports that were analysed in detailPlease provide information on the criteria used for selecting emissions reports for detailed analysis using the third column % 
Number of inspections of installations that were carried out through site visits by the competent authority  
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012  
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of other reasonsPlease indicate the reasons for rejecting the emissions reports using the third column  
Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emissions reports 
Other action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emissions reports 

 6.6. 
If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived under a particular condition. Add further rows if necessary.


Condition for waiving site visit Main Annex I activity Number of installations
  


Were site visits waived for installations with low emissions referred to in Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012? Yes/No

If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived.


Total number of site visits waived for installations with low emissions 
 6.C.  6.7. 

Aircraft operator identification code Total annual emissions of the aircraft operator(t CO2(e)) Reason for making a conservative estimation Share (in %) of emissions of the aircraft operator conservatively estimated Method used to conservatively estimate the emissions Further action taken or proposed
     



 6.8. 
If yes, please provide information in the tables below for emissions and tonne-kilometre data respectively.


Type of issue found Number of aircraft operators Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general) Share (in %) of verified emissions reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority
   




Type of issue found Number of aircraft operators Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general)
  


 6.9. 
If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the tables below for emissions and tonne-kilometre data respectively.


Checks on the verified emissions reports
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency % 
Share of the emissions reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan % 
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with other dataPlease provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the third column % 
Share of the emissions reports that were analysed in detailPlease provide information on the criteria used for selecting emissions reports for detailed analysis using the third column % 
Number of inspections carried out on aircraft operators  
Number of verified emissions reports rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012  
Number of verified emissions reports rejected because of other reasonsPlease indicate the reasons for rejecting the emissions reports using the third column  
Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emissions reports 
Other action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emissions reports 



Checks on the tonne-kilometre reports
Share of the tonne-kilometre reports checked for completeness and internal consistency % 
Share of the tonne kilometre reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan % 
Share of the tonne kilometre reports that were cross-checked with other dataPlease provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the third column % 
Share of the tonne kilometre reports that were analysed in detailPlease provide information on the criteria used for selecting tonne kilometre reports for detailed analysis using the third column % 
Number of inspections carried out on aircraft operators  
Number of verified tonne kilometre reports rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012  
Number of verified tonne kilometre reports rejected because of other reasonsPlease indicate in the reasons for rejecting the tonne-kilometre reports using the third column  
Action taken as a consequence of checks on verified tonne-kilometre reports 

 6.10. 
If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of small emitters for which a site visit was waived.


Total number of site visits waived for small emitters 
 7.  7.1. Please attach a copy of your Member State specific terms and conditions required to be signed by account holders.
 7.2. 

Installation/operator identification code Operator Name Installation name Number of allowances outstanding Reason for no reasonable further prospect
    
    

 7.3. 

Number of occasions that the mandate was used during the reporting period 

Which aircraft operators used a mandate during the reporting period as provided for in Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 389/2013? Please provide the information by using the table below. Add further rows if necessary.


Aircraft operator identification code Aircraft operator name
 

 8.  8.1. 

 During the reporting period Since the start of third trading period
Reason for the change in the allocation Number of changes in the reporting period Quantity of emission allowances corresponding to all changes in the reporting period Number of changes since the start of the third trading period Quantity of emission allowances corresponding to all changes since the start of the third trading period
Allocation to new installations or new sub-installations as referred to in Article 19 of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU (OJ L 130, 17.5.2011, p. 1)    
Significant capacity extensions as referred to in Article 20 of Decision 2011/278/EU    
Cessation as referred to in Article 22(1)(a) — (d) of Decision 2011/278/EU    
Cessation as referred to in Article 22(1)(e) of Decision 2011/278/EU    
Significant capacity reductions as referred to in Article 21 of Decision 2011/278/EU    
Partial cessation as referred to in Article 23 of Decision 2011/278/EU    
 8.2. 
If yes, please specify in the table below how many installations it concerned and how these changes were identified.


Number of installations that did not notify planned of effective changes How the planned or effective changes were identified
 
 8.3. 
If yes, please provide in the table below the total number of emission allowances issued and the total value of investments made under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC in the reporting period?


 Within the reporting period
Total number of emission allowances issued under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC 
Total value of investments under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC 
 9. 
Question 9.1 is to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 9.1. 

Measures taken to ensure that relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the Final report of the WCD, have been respected Yes/No Comments
Project participants are legally obliged to adhere to relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the World Commission on Dams November 2000 Report “Dams and Development — A New Framework for Decision-Making”  
Adherence to relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the World Commission on Dams November 2000 Report “Dams and Development — A New Framework for Decision-Making” is verified. If yes, please specify the relevant authority, e.g. competent authority or designated national authority (DNA) using the comments column  
In approving hydroelectric power production project activities with a generating capacity exceeding 20 MW, the DNA or another relevant authority is required to adhere to a set of harmonised guidelines on the application of Article 11b(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC, agreed to by Member States at the Climate Change Committee  
Project proponents have to submit a validated Article 11b(6) compliance report in line with the harmonised guidelines. If yes, please provide relevant documents or web-links using the comments column  
Entities other than designated operational entities (DOEs) are also authorised to carry out a validation of the Article 11b(6) Compliance Report. If yes, please specify who these entities are using the comments column  
Project activities are approved in line with the harmonised guidelines. If yes, please specify the number of project activities approved using the comments column  
The general public have access to information on hydroelectric production project activities approved in your Member State in line with Article 11 b(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC. If yes, please provide information on this access including web-links, if available, using the comments column  
Other, please specify:  
 10. 
Questions 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 are only to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 10.A.  10.1. 
If yes, please provide details in the table below regarding fees charged for the issuance and update of permits and approval and update of monitoring plans.


Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
Permit issuance/monitoring plan approval 
Permit update 
Permit transfer 
Permit surrender 
New entrant reserve application 
Other, please specify: 

If yes, please provide details for the annual subsistence fees using the following table.


Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
Annual subsistence charge 
Other, please specify 
 10.B.  10.2. 
If yes, please provide details in the table below regarding fees charged for the approval and update of monitoring plans.


Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
Approval of monitoring plan for emissions 
Approval of change to monitoring plan for emissions 
Approval of monitoring plan for tonne-kilometre data 
Approval of change to monitoring plan for tonne-kilometre data 
Transfer of monitoring plan 
Surrender of monitoring plan 
Other, please specify 

If yes, please provide in the table below details for the annual subsistence fees..


Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
Annual subsistence charge 
Other, please specify 
 10.C.  10.3. 

Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
 
 


Reason for fee/description Amount in euros
 
 
 11.  11.A. 
Questions 11.1 and 11.2 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 11.1. 

Measures taken to ensure compliance Yes/No
Spot checks and inspection of implementation and compliance by installations with the monitoring plan and Regulations (EU) No 601/2012 and (EU) No 600/2012 
Regular meetings with industry and/or verifiers 
Ensuring that selling of emission allowances is prohibited in the case of irregularities 
Publishing the names of operators that are not in compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 
Other, please specify:
 11.2. 

Type of infringement Fines in euros Imprisonment in months Other
Min Max Min Max 
Operation without a permit     
Failure to comply with the conditions of the permit     
Failure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authority     
Failure to submit supporting documentation in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to hold a required sampling plan(s) approved by the competent authority     
Failure to monitor in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
The quality assurance of measurement equipment is not in line with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to implement the procedures required by Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 14 to 16 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to submit a verified emissions report in due time     
Failure to submit an improvement report(s) in accordance with Article 69 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012     
The verified emissions report is found not to be in line with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to notify planned or effective changes to capacity, activity levels and operation of an installation by 31 December of the reporting period in accordance with Article 24 of Decision 2011/278/EU     
Other, please specify     
 11.3. 

Type of infringement Actual penalties imposed Are there ongoing proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty?Yes/No Was the penalty executed?Yes/No
Fines in euros Imprisonment in months Other
Type of infringement should be selected from the list in question 11.2. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line     
     
 11.4. 

Installation identification code Name of operator
 

 11.B. 
Questions 11.5, 11.6 and 11.9 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period
 11.5. 

Measures taken Yes/No
Spot checks and inspection of the implementation of and compliance by aircraft operators with the monitoring plan and Regulations (EU) No 601/2012 and (EU) No 600/2012 
Regular meetings with aircraft operators and/or verifiers 
Ensuring that selling of emission allowances is prohibited in the case of irregularities 
Publishing the names of aircraft operators that are not in compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 
Other, please specify:
 11.6. 

Type of infringement Fines in euros Imprisonment in months Other
Min Max Min Max 
Failure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authority     
Failure to submit supporting documentation in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to monitor in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to implement the procedures required by Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 14 to 16 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to correct discrepancies in the reported completeness of flights     
Failure to submit a verified emissions report in due time     
Failure to submit an improvement report(s) in accordance with Article 69 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Failure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012     
The verified emissions report is found not to be in line with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
The verified tonne-kilometre report is found not to be in line with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012     
Other, please specify:     
 11.7. 

Type of infringement Actual penalties imposed Are there ongoing proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty?Yes/No Was the penalty executed?Yes/No
Fines in euros Imprisonment in months Other
Type of infringement should be selected from the list in question 11.6. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line     
     
 11.8. 

Aircraft operator identification code Name of aircraft operator
 

 11.9. What measures would have to be taken in your Member State before your Member State would request an operating ban from the Commission in accordance with Article 16(10) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please specify below the types of measures.
 12. 
Questions 12.1, 12.2, 12.3 and 12.4 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 12.1. What is the legal nature of an emission allowance in your Member State?
 12.2. What is the accounting treatment of emission allowances in the annual financial report of the companies following the Member State’s accounting norm?
 12.3. 
Is VAT due on transaction of emission allowances on the secondary market? Yes/No

Does your Member State apply the reverse-charge mechanism on domestic transactions involving emission allowances? Yes/No
 12.4. 
If yes, please indicate in the table below the type of tax and tax rates that apply. Add further rows if necessary.


Type of tax Tax rate applied
 
 
 13. 
Question 13.1 and 13.2 are to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
 13.1. 

Arrangements concerning fraudulent activities Details of arrangements and procedures in national law
What arrangements, if any, are in place for operators, aircraft operators or third parties to raise concerns over potentially fraudulent activity regarding the free allocation of allowances? 
What arrangements are in place for the investigation of concerns over potentially fraudulent activity regarding the free allocation of allowances? 
What arrangements are in place for prosecution of fraudulent activity related to the free allocation of allowances? 
In the event of prosecution for fraudulent activities, what are the maximum penalties? Please describe fines and imprisonment terms. 
 13.2. 

Arrangements concerning the communication of fraudulent activities to the competent authority Details of arrangements and procedures
What arrangements, if any, are in place so that the competent authority is made aware of investigations on fraudulent activities? 
What arrangements, if any, are in place so that the competent authority is made aware of cases on fraudulent activities brought to court? 
What arrangements, if any, are in place so that the competent authority is made aware of court cases on fraudulent activities settled out of court? 
What arrangements, if any, are in place so that the competent authority is made aware of the verdict of court cases on fraudulent activities? 
 13.3. 

— the number of investigations carried out in the reporting period (including ongoing);
— the number of cases brought to court in the reporting period;
— the number of cases settled out of court without conviction and the number of cases leading to acquittal in the reporting period; and
— the number of cases in the reporting period leading to a conviction that a fraudulent activity was committed.


Information concerning fraudulent activities Number Type of fraud or fraudulent activity
Number of investigations carried out  
Number of cases brought to court  
Number of cases settled out of court without conviction and the number of cases leading to acquittal  
Number of cases leading to a conviction that a fraudulent activity has been committed  
 14.  14.1. 

Section Other information or issues of concern concerning
General 
Section 2 
Section 3 
Section 4 
Section 5 
Section 6 
Section 7 
Section 8 
Section 9 
Section 10 
Section 11 
Section 12 
Section 13 
 14.2. 
If no, please return to the question concerned.

