
Article 1 
The preparatory action, as set out in the Annex (‘the preparatory action’) is hereby adopted.
Article 2 
For the purposes of this Decision, the definition of ‘control post’ in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 shall apply.
Article 3 
The maximum contribution of the Community for the implementation of the preparatory action is set at EUR 4 000 000, to be financed from budget line 17 04 03 03 of the general budget of the European Communities for 2009.
Article 4 

1. The authorising officer may adopt any changes to this Decision which are not considered substantial within the meaning of Article 90(4) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and of proportionality.
2. Cumulated changes of the allocations to the actions covered by the preparatory action not exceeding 10 % of the maximum contribution provided for in Article 3 shall not be considered to be substantial within the meaning of Article 90(4) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, provided that they do not significantly affect the nature and objective of the preparatory action.
Done at Brussels, 13 October 2009.
For the Commission
Androulla VASSILIOU
Member of the Commission
ANNEX
1.1. 
This preparatory action contains two implementing measures for 2009. On the basis of the objectives given in the preparatory action, the allocation of budget and the main actions are the following:


— for procurement (implemented in direct centralised management): EUR 200 000,
— for grants (implemented in direct centralised management or under indirect centralised management if the delegation is made to executive agencies): EUR 3 800 000.

1.2. 
The global budgetary envelope reserved in 2009 for the procurement contracts amounts to EUR 200 000.

Preparatory action within the meaning of Article 49(6)(b) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.

17 04 03 03

One study to evaluate the feasibility of a certification scheme of control posts.

The objectives of the study shall be to collect information on the current status of control posts and their use in the Community in order to assess which quality criteria would define high quality control posts. The study shall also examine the feasibility of a certification scheme for such control posts.

The implementation shall be carried out directly by the Directorate-General for Health and Consumers.

The carrying out of the study is foreseen to last not more than six months and shall be performed in the context of a framework contract. Requests for services shall be launched after the adoption of this Decision.

The study shall be carried out through the evaluation framework contract 2009-2013 of Directorate-General for Health and Consumers: Ref/Contract evaluation, impact assessment and related services; Lot 3, Food Chain SANCO/2008/01/055 Lot 3.

1.3. 
Grants shall be awarded by means of a written agreement (grant agreement).

Preparatory action within the meaning of Article 49(6)(b) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.

17 04 03 03

The increased transport of animals by road over long journeys has raised the need for improved control posts where animals are to rest. In the interest of animal health and welfare it has been necessary to introduce specific measures to avoid stress to the animals and the spreading of infectious diseases. The objective of the action is to increase the use of control posts and promote high quality control posts.

The action shall consist in building or renovating high quality control posts in order to validate an experimental certification scheme based on the results of the feasibility study. The action is expected to encourage an economically viable certification scheme for high quality control posts in order to improve the welfare of animals transported over long journeys.

The implementation shall be carried out directly by the Directorate-General for Health and Consumers.

A single call for proposals of EUR 3 800 000 shall be published. The action shall be performed within 24 months following the signature of the grant agreement. The call for proposals shall be launched after the completion of the study on the evaluation of the feasibility, referred to in Section 1.2.

70 %


— Selection criteria:
— Financial capacity of the applicant:
— Applicants must show that they have the financial capacity to carry out the action to be financed.
— Applicants must provide evidence that they have the own resources essential to the Community cofinancing requested and to manage the necessary cash-flow for the management of the project. The amount of the grant given to a beneficiary must not exceed the total amount of his/her own capital and long-term debt.
— Technical and professional capacity of the applicant:
— Applicants must have the technical capacity and the professional capability to carry out the action to be co-financed. They must provide evidence of their knowledge and experience in the field of animal-related infrastructure and animal transport operations. They must provide certification and descriptions of projects and activities undertaken by them in the last three years and more particularly of projects related to the relevant issue. They must provide detailed curriculum vitae of each member of their team and demonstrate the managerial capabilities of the project director and manager, including his or her educational background, degrees and diplomas, professional experience, research work and publications.
— Applicants must demonstrate that organisations applying for the action are committed to the objectives of the project and support the principle of introducing a certification scheme for control posts which is to be implemented by the action. They must provide evidence of the contacts and international stakeholders that they intend to consult, in particular as regards certification, and whose resources they intend to draw upon in the course of the execution of the preparatory action.
— Award criteria:
— The following general award criteria shall apply:
— Soundness of the approach (20 %),
— Organisation of work and degree of involvement of competent authorities/organisations in the Member States covered by the action (30 %),
— Relevance of the project at Community level and multiplier effect (30 %),
— Cost effectiveness ratio of the project (20 %),

Written agreement.
